[Blog Home] | [Home] | [Forums] | [Wiki]


Monday, September 17, 2007

The Open J: Grab Bag

So the offseason has been a bit slow, but some of you have been stopping by and reading what we are covering these days. Time to return the favor!

I pulled this question out of one of our comments, posted by jasond76. He asked:

I agree about Johnson, actually. Although I honestly had to research him to become more familiar with what he could offer, I really think he could be a positive player for the Heat. Anyone Hollinger rates as a top 10 rookie around the all-star break is a great addition. With all of the interest Haslem is garnering, is there a chance we might trade Haslem for other needs (SF, a younger/healthier PG) and consider giving Johnson major minutes?


Hollinger rated Alex Johnson in the top 10 rookie class, huh? I didn't know that, very interesting.

I think we have to be realistic about something - Udonis Haslem has probably the most value of the Heat players that we could part with. Sure, you could argue that Jason Williams does, since he has a one year deal. But Haslem's age and affordable contract, coupled with his production and experience, make him an excellent candidate to be a complementary piece for a playoff team. The question is, as I believe I understand jasond76's suggestion, is can the Heat actually afford to part with him? On another "Open J" article, I actually posted that the Heat should trade UD.

So, my answer is yes.

The only question is, to whom? First things first - can Alexander Johnson push Haslem from the starting spot? Quite possibly. That isn't to say UD is not any good, just that Johnson has vast potential and it has gone quite untapped since his college days at FSU. He is explosive, athletic, and with those gifts comes confidence that he can perform at the pro level. He can rebound, he can score, and his long reach enable him to defend better and hurry his assignments and force them to shoot contested shots. UD gets better positioning, but that is something Johnson can work on and obtain with experience. Johnson has a solid midrange game, not quite as good as UD's, but Haslem was not polished by any means coming into training camp as an undrafted rookie with the Heat a few years back.

Yes, Haslem is expendable, and for that very reason he should be dealt. We Heat fans tend to overvalue him, but coupled with another asset, something tangible could be yielded in return.

Also, watch this Charlie Bell signing very carefully. If the Heat are able to retain him, this could be a signal that a move is imminent. On its own, this Bell signing has very good value as the Heat gain a shooter and scorer in Bell that could complement Wade's game and even afford the Heat to play Bell alongside Wade while giving Bell the point guard as the defensive assignment. And they could do so with confidence. This of course means that Jason Williams could be just a bit more expendable, but it would also mean that the Heat would have to be confident with Smush Parker as their starting PG.

The Johnson signing definitely makes Haslem a bit more expendable. Signing Bell could mean that we would be free to drop another asset into the pot to pull the trigger on a deal. We'll see if the gambit pays off.

Thanks again, jasond76 for the question. Keep 'em coming!

4 comments:

JasonD76 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
JasonD76 said...

Sorry about deleting the last post. I tried to edit it to no avail.

Here's the Hollinger post if anyone's interested in reading it (you'll need ESPN Insider): http://insider.espn.go.com/nba
/allstar2007/insider/columns
/story?columnist=hollinger_john&id
=2767820 (You'll have to piece it together, unfortunately. It all wouldn't fit).
As for trading Haslem, I'd hate to see him go, but if it means the team can improve, I'd trade anyone. The question becomes though, who would we package him with, and what could we expect in return? The possibilities are endless. Would Heat fans be interested in a deal like Jason Williams, Udonis Haslem, and Antoine Walker for Mike Bibby and Ron Artest? Would Sacramento fans even consider it? I'd pull the trigger on that in a heartbeat in spite of Artest's volatility, but hey... I'm just dreaming there.

JasonD76 said...

A case for Kirilenko: He supposedly stated he wants out of Utah, and while his contract is not appealing, he certainly is (if we get anything resembling the Kirilenko of previous years not including this past one). His PER average for the last 5 years was 20.708. That puts him easily as our 3rd best player. He also plays great defense and doesn't need to be the focal point of the offense. What would we use to get him? Potentially, Haslem and Walker for Kirilenko if he comes as cheap as an off year and a trade request might suggest. I'd love to get Jason Hart in there as well, but he can't be traded until mid-December.

Unknown said...

We'll have to kick these ideas around some more...